Take a look at the review on the Nikon 8800, I had one, and it was fantastic.Since gone to Nikon D80Mike Rudge..
The 8800 isn't exactly what I would call compact..
Take a look at my album.http://www.F1Album.com..
For what you've described I'd suggest you look at these cameras..
Fuji F30 or F31fd - compact, great in low light.
Canon A570IS or A710IS - compact good all rounder compacts. The 710 has a 6x zoom which is a good range..
Fuji S6000/6500 - great super zoom, great in low light ( same sensor as F30/31 ).
Canon S3 - good all round super zoom.
Panasonic TZ3 - compact super zoom, although perhaps not ideal for low light if you don't use a flash Good choice if weights an issue..
If you want something with more control in a compact body, perhaps the Fuji E900 or Canon G7. However these are more suitable for enthusiasts than anyone else..
Perhaps a waterproof camera might be useful if you do hike a lot or in less pleasant weather. Olympus and Pentax do a range of compacts that are more weather resistant. They're not outstanding in any photography department, but they are perfectly capable..
StephenG.
Fuji S9600Fuji S5200Fuji F30Fuji E900Canon A710ISPCLinuxOS..
It is actualy classed as a SLR, a compact, a camera with a fixed lens ..
A camera with a removable lens is a DSLR (Detachable Single Lens Reflex) sorry I dont write the rools, please dont shoot the messanger..
Image control:Zoom outZoom 100%Zoom inExpand AllOpen in new window.
Mike Rudge..
Funny, I thought DSLR stood for Digital SLR .. and these aren't rules as such, there are many opinions instead, and I don't count the like of the Nikon you mentioned as an SLR, it doesn't have a prism and what you see when you look through the viewfinder is another LCD screen..
Compact to me means just that.compact, i.e. somthing to can fit in your pocket..
Take a look at my album.http://www.F1Album.com..
Thanks to everyone for all the advicevery helpful... If I was choosing between the Fuji f31fd and the Fuji s6000fd, which would take better pictures? I read the reviews, and it seems like the s6000fd would require shooting low light pictures in raw and post processing in order to get better results (on par with the f31fd). Is the main advantage of the 6000 that it gives better control over the pictures or is there more to it than that?.
Thanks again!..

