Well you can either click the 'share' button right below the pic. (That would be the button next to caption).

Or you can hit the print screen button on your keyboard which saves the whole window to your clipboard, then paste and crop it in your favorite post processing app...

Canoneyesed wrote:.

Or you can hit the print screen button on your keyboard which savesthe whole window to your clipboard, then paste and crop it in yourfavorite post processing app..

What app do you recommend?.

I used print screen, then pasted into Word. It works ok, but I can't figure out how to edit the image. I would like to remove the web site graphics and save the photo only. Then enlarge the photo a little...

Ken Mosinski wrote:.

What app do you recommend?.

I used print screen, then pasted into Word..

Word is a word processor, not an image editor..

Google for Irfanview, it's free and will do what you want...

The images are in your temporary internet files folder......

Hi Ken,.

Easy,.

1. Click on image,2. Right click3. Click on "copy"4. Goto your editing software or word,5. Right click then click paste.

Regards,Gary..

Did you read the question? It's flash so right-click wasn't working for him..

Just hit PrtSc, then paste into an image editor instead of into a word processor..

[ e d @ h a l l e yc c ] http://www.halley.cc/pix/..

Why do you want to steal a copyrighted photo then edit the website information out of it?.

If you need it for a legal case, have you considerered contacting the news station?.

DIPics.

Ken Mosinski wrote:.

I'm trying to save these photos on my pc:.

Http://www.knbc.com/slideshow/13997483/detail.html?taf=la.

When I right click on the photo, it says Adobe flash 9. But itdoesn't let me copy or save to a file. Is there a way to do this?Thanks...

Ken Mosinski wrote:.

I used print screen, then pasted into Word. It works ok, but I can'tfigure out how to edit the image. I would like to remove the website graphics and save the photo only. Then enlarge the photo alittle..

You will also need to contact the website owner as these images are the copyright of the website. You will need their permission to alter their images, depending in the end use..

JohnPentax *ist-D, K100D, Fuji F20/31fd, Oly Stylushttp://www.pbase.com/jglover..

Dipics wrote:.

Why do you want to steal a copyrighted photo then edit the websiteinformation out of it?.

If you need it for a legal case, have you considerered contacting thenews station?.

I was wondering how long it would take before one of the "copyright is absolute" camp would attach to this thread. Copyright has it's limits, but of course that's not popular to say on a photography forum. Pardon the long rant in response to a very short but all-too-common whine around here..

One: the word "steal" is not appropriate. Copyright can be infringed, but a copy of a copyrighted work cannot be stolen. The legal definition of theft necessarily leaves the owner without the thing that was stolen; the original website still has their copy and the government-backed monopoly powers are still in tact. Use the right word..

Two: derivative works such as collages can hold artistic merit on their own, and in the collective may have their own copyright. The original components or fragments of a composition are not necessarily infringing. All of culture builds on culture. I could easily imagine a collection of such images being a worthwhile artistic endeavor, or simply a passing hobby..

Three: in the USA, there are four basic defenses to copyright infringement. They are not absolute "bright lines" with tidy objective answers, but questions and factors that must be decided in a courtroom using the rational, organic and un-automated faculties of human beings. These involve the amount copied, the financial benefit to the one who copied, the purpose for the copy, and the financial impact that such a copy would have on the owner. Seeing the images, I can hardly imagine any case where the images are worth any value to owner or copier, even if copied in full with a solid intent to try to make money..

Four: there is a whole world out there, and the USA can't get all countries to pass the USA's laws (though it tries really hard and pisses off a lot of people in the process). This guy claims to be from the USA, but some folks are from countries that neither prosecute nor believe in the idea of intellectual property law. Our own publishing industry was built squarely on the idea of "stealing" or reprinting another country's books, and our first librarian (Ben Franklin) was also a publisher and a pirate. To imagine that it was okay for us but not okay for any other country is absurd. If it was not okay back then either, then you should rally for the USA to give restitution to Britain and other countries for those past crimes, or you should work harder to push your morality of intellectual property into every corner of the globe..

[ e d @ h a l l e yc c ] http://www.halley.cc/pix/..